|
|
Meetings in split format
|
Here is a list of Fuego meetings we've held:
|
{{TableOfContents}}Here is a list of Fuego meetings we've held:
|
|
It would be good to combine the meeting notes in a single page, like AGL-CIAT does.
|
It would be good to combine the meeting notes in a single page, like AGL-CIAT does.
|
|
For AGL-CIAT meetings, see https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-ciat/meetings
|
For AGL-CIAT meetings, see https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-ciat/meetings
|
|
|
= Meetings === 2017-04-25 ==The next meeting is scheduled for April 25, 2017 (at 5:00 am PDT)
|
|
|
== 2017-03-21 ==Conference call with AGL-CIAT group
|
|
Here was my pre-meeting agenda:This was a conference call held with the AGL-CIAT group, on March 21, 2017
|
Here was my pre-meeting agenda:This was a conference call held with the AGL-CIAT group, on March 21, 2017
|
|
See the AGL-CIAT meeting page (section)
|
See the [[https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-ciat/meetings#meeting_20170321|AGL-CIAT meeting page (section)]]
|
|
|
=== goals for meeting ===Tim would like to discuss: * status of toshiba/sony merge * resolving technical issues with Tim's 'next' branch (based on Daniel's 'next' branch) * log paths - have consolidates logs for a test * Jenkins BUILD_ID changed from timestamp to build number * post_test - need processes to pkill * this is a cleanup operation, and should be in the base script * need test_cleanup * for most tests this could be empty * some tests might call a new function: kill_procs * it calls ov_rootfs_pkill underneath * priority list for AGL, to start that merge * LAVA integration * is 'uniform test output' a high-priority feature? * planning for an official fuego release * 1.1.0 release, code name: blaze (or brimestone?)
|
|
|
=== technical issues === * '''TESTNAME (base script name) is derived from the test name (<prefix>.testname)''' * I propose changing this to fuego_test.sh, so they're all the same * any objections - pros?/cons? * pro - can eliminate TESTNAME, and remove from test.yaml file also * pro - less chance of conflict with a script by that name in the test itself * pro - can grep base scripts more easily (all names the same, and no conflicts with other names) * con - can't identify test from it's own name. It's dependent on the test directory to disambiguate it from other tests' base scripts. * con - can't use base-script (arg0?) to find test directory. I'm not sure if this is needed * '''use of spec name in job name, instead of plan name''' * this allows creating jobs by spec instead of plan * this supports multiple specs for the same test, in a single plan * '''add node and job scripts to ftc''' * eliminate fuego-ro/scripts * '''move /fuego-ro/conf/boards to /fuego-ro/boards''' * '''automatically create a view for each board''' * using regex of: "<board_name>.*" * '''put log links (and others) in description even if job fails''' * don't require buildsetter plugin * automatically detect log, plot and xlsx files * support partial results * lots of times there is a test log there, even if the build failed * try to eliminate need for extralinks in testplan file * '''eliminate need for timeout in testplan file''' * do a better job of automatically calculating timeouts * this is dependent on test, spec, board and other parameters, not the plan
|
|
|